All use cases
- manufacturing
- Engineering
- representative
Standing Up Design Automation Inside an Existing CATIA and PLM Stack
An aerospace supplier wants design automation but cannot move off its established CATIA and Teamcenter environment, where certification evidence lives.
Runs onShilpaHow the work runs
The pressure that made this worth automating, the steps the system runs, and what came out the other side.
Pressure & Trigger Points
- Any tool that requires exporting geometry out of the certified environment is a non-starter.
- Design automation pilots have previously failed because they lived beside the real workflow rather than inside it.
- Certification requires that every design decision remain traceable to an accountable engineer.
The run · 5 operational steps
Click any step to inspect telemetry signals, model reasoning, and governance gates.
scroll →
1
In-Stack Deployment
Shilpa runs against the existing CATIA and Teamcenter environment rather than requiring geometry to leave it.
Input Signal:
Real-time operational telemetry & queue
Reasoning Pattern:
MCP grounded vector inference
Governance Gate:
Policy constrained with audit write-back
Verified Business Outcomes
- Design automation running inside the certified environment rather than beside it.
- Engineer accountability preserved on every generated element.
- Adoption on a bounded family before any wider commitment.
Capabilities this relies on
- generative design
- system connectors
- root cause reasoning
- human approval
Related catalog agents
More in Shilpa