Skip to content
Authorized security probes assessing a defended perimeter
Wayam Solution · Autonomous Security TestingT4Reference pattern

Vedha

vedha - piercing, going through to what is inside

Authorized penetration testing on a release cadence, not a quarterly one.

Vedha is an autonomous multi-agent penetration testing platform for authorized security work. A goal is decomposed into an ordered plan, specialist agents carry out reconnaissance, discovery, and exploitation attempts inside an ephemeral sandbox, and a knowledge graph retains what has been found so later work builds on it rather than repeating it. Findings arrive as a structured report mapped to control areas. Because agents reason about whether a finding is genuinely exploitable, false positive rates fall well below signature-based scanning.

Workflow

Problem

Manual penetration tests cost tens of thousands and land weeks after the code has already changed, leaving a blind spot between engagements that grows with every deploy.

Outcome

Pentest-quality findings produced continuously against authorized scope, with reasoning and evidence attached to every finding.

  1. 01

    Scope and authorize

    A target and goal are defined against scope the customer explicitly authorizes.

  2. 02

    Plan and decompose

    The goal becomes an ordered set of subtasks, refined as the environment reveals itself.

  3. 03

    Execute in a sandbox

    Tooling runs inside an ephemeral container so the target environment is never put at risk.

  4. 04

    Report with evidence

    Findings are categorized by control area with severity, exploitability reasoning, and remediation.

Modules

  • Goal Decomposition

    A stated testing goal broken into an ordered plan of scoped subtasks.

  • Sandboxed Execution

    Every tool and script runs inside an ephemeral container, isolated from the target environment.

  • Knowledge Graph Memory

    Discovered assets and relationships retained across subtasks and sessions instead of rediscovered.

  • Structured Reporting

    Findings categorized by control area with severity and remediation, ready for a compliance file.

Representative use cases

Evidence

What Wayam can show for this entry

T4Reference pattern

Curated solution design with an owner and a review date. No performance or production claim.

Allowed claims at this tier: Possible workflow, typical stack, prerequisites.

Evidence tier
T4 · Reference pattern
Integration status
Typical enterprise system
Metric status
Scenario only
Evidence owner
Not yet attached
Validated
Not yet attached
Valid until
Content version
2026.09

Pending evidence attachment

This entry represents an enterprise architectural reference pattern. Customer benchmarks, run replays, and metric verifications are established during technical discovery.

Limitations

  • Headline metrics are representative until a customer result is attached.

Representative metrics · Reference · scenario only

  • Continuous

    testing cadence instead of quarterly

  • Reasoned

    findings assessed for exploitability, not pattern-matched

These describe the intended outcome of the design. They are not measured customer results until a validated case is attached above.

Architecture & controls

Composed across the operating loop

Control gates

  • A named approver on every consequential write-back
  • Evidence and audit trail kept with every run
  • In-boundary deployment available

Capability atoms

  • workflow-orchestration
  • generative-design
  • root-cause-reasoning
  • risk-scoring
  • evidence-audit-trail
  • human-approval
  • in-boundary-deployment

Typical enterprise systems

Typical stack for solution design; compatibility is validated during discovery.

  • Microsoft Sentinel
  • CrowdStrike Falcon
  • Splunk
  • Wiz
  • GitHub
  • Cursor
  • Anthropic Claude Code
  • Kubernetes

Designed for

technology, financial-services, healthcare, public-sector

Business case

Model a Vedha scenario with your own baseline

Three scenarios from the numbers you enter. Capacity released is time; it becomes a saving only when roles or costs are actually removed or avoided.

ScenarioImprovementCapacity releasedCashable savingsNet annualPayback
Conservative9%
Expected18%
Upside24%

Enter an annual volume and a baseline cost to see figures.

Illustrative planning scenario, not a guarantee. Results depend on process baseline, adoption, data quality, integration scope, controls, and deployment costs.

Pilot this

From solution design to a bounded pilot

  1. Step 1 · 3–4 weeks

    Discovery Sprint

    Validate the workflow, data, controls, baseline and business case before anything is built.

    Gate: Blueprint and pilot plan signed by the business owner, technical owner and Wayam.

  2. Step 2 · 6–10 weeks

    Bounded Pilot

    Prove quality and value on agreed data against agreed acceptance tests.

    Gate: Acceptance thresholds met on the evaluation set; go/no-go decision recorded.

Pairs well with