Skip to content
Speech form resolving into structured analytics bars
Wayam Solution · Conversational Analytics · formerly Talk2DataT4Reference pattern

Bodham

bodham - understanding, the moment a thing becomes known

Ask the question in plain language; get validated SQL, charts, and an answer.

Bodham turns natural-language questions into data answers. Connect a database or upload a spreadsheet, then ask what you want to know. An agentic pipeline converts the question into validated SQL, runs it, and returns interactive charts, clean tables, and a written insight summary. Saved chats, pinned charts, and voice input make exploring data conversational, putting real analytics in the hands of business users rather than only the analysts who can write the query.

Workflow

Problem

Business questions queue behind the analysts who can write SQL, so decisions wait days for numbers that took minutes to produce.

Outcome

Analytics in the hands of any business user, with the query validated and the reasoning shown rather than hidden.

  1. 01

    Connect the source

    A governed database or an uploaded spreadsheet becomes the grounded scope for questions.

  2. 02

    Convert and validate

    The question is turned into SQL and validated before it runs, not after it returns something odd.

  3. 03

    Return the answer

    Results come back as interactive charts and tables, with the query visible for anyone who wants to check it.

  4. 04

    Explain and keep

    A written summary accompanies the numbers, and useful answers are pinned and saved.

Modules

  • Agentic Query Pipeline

    A question converted into validated SQL, executed, and returned with the query shown.

  • Interactive Results

    Charts and clean tables generated from the result, pinnable into a working set.

  • Insight Summaries

    A written reading of what the numbers say, alongside the numbers themselves.

  • Voice & Saved Chats

    Voice input and saved conversation history so analysis is resumable, not repeated.

Evidence

What Wayam can show for this entry

T4Reference pattern

Curated solution design with an owner and a review date. No performance or production claim.

Allowed claims at this tier: Possible workflow, typical stack, prerequisites.

Evidence tier
T4 · Reference pattern
Integration status
Typical enterprise system
Metric status
Scenario only
Evidence owner
Not yet attached
Validated
Not yet attached
Valid until
Content version
2026.09

Pending evidence attachment

This entry represents an enterprise architectural reference pattern. Customer benchmarks, run replays, and metric verifications are established during technical discovery.

Limitations

  • Headline metrics are representative until a customer result is attached.

Representative metrics · Reference · scenario only

  • Seconds

    from question to charted answer

  • No SQL

    required of the person asking

These describe the intended outcome of the design. They are not measured customer results until a validated case is attached above.

Architecture & controls

Composed across the operating loop

Control gates

  • A named approver on every consequential write-back
  • Evidence and audit trail kept with every run

Capability atoms

  • nl-to-query
  • system-connectors
  • workflow-orchestration
  • evidence-audit-trail

Typical enterprise systems

Typical stack for solution design; compatibility is validated during discovery.

  • SAP S/4HANA
  • Workday
  • Oracle NetSuite
  • Snowflake
  • SAP MCP
  • Dun and Bradstreet API
  • dbt
  • Monte Carlo

Designed for

technology, retail-cpg, financial-services, logistics

Business case

Model a Bodham scenario with your own baseline

Three scenarios from the numbers you enter. Capacity released is time; it becomes a saving only when roles or costs are actually removed or avoided.

ScenarioImprovementCapacity releasedCashable savingsNet annualPayback
Conservative9%
Expected18%
Upside24%

Enter an annual volume and a baseline cost to see figures.

Illustrative planning scenario, not a guarantee. Results depend on process baseline, adoption, data quality, integration scope, controls, and deployment costs.

Pilot this

From solution design to a bounded pilot

  1. Step 1 · 3–4 weeks

    Discovery Sprint

    Validate the workflow, data, controls, baseline and business case before anything is built.

    Gate: Blueprint and pilot plan signed by the business owner, technical owner and Wayam.

  2. Step 2 · 6–10 weeks

    Bounded Pilot

    Prove quality and value on agreed data against agreed acceptance tests.

    Gate: Acceptance thresholds met on the evaluation set; go/no-go decision recorded.

Agrani · evidence pending1 Agrani candidate in this solution: Sentiment Detection Agent

Pairs well with