Skip to content
Abstract icon for the Legacy Estate Intake module of Setu
Wayam Solution · Modern BIT4Reference pattern

Setu

setu - bridge, a crossing built to be used

Legacy BI to modern analytics: migration, parity, and AI-ready insight.

Setu is the legacy-to-modern BI accelerator: move enterprises off aging dashboard estates onto modern analytics environments, validate parity, recover license spend, and activate AI/BI use cases such as Microsoft Fabric data agents and Databricks Genie. Tableau and peer suites are source estates within that narrative, not Setu's identity.

Workflow

Problem

Enterprises are stuck on legacy BI estates that burn license spend and block the move to modern platforms and AI-native analytics.

Outcome

A clear path from legacy to modern BI: automated migration with parity, license recovery, and activation of AI/BI agents on the target platform.

  1. 01

    Inventory the legacy estate

    Dashboards, data sources, and real usage are catalogued so the program is scoped on evidence.

  2. 02

    Auto-migrate

    The engine converts 80–90% of dashboards to the target modern BI platform automatically.

  3. 03

    Validate parity

    Migrated output is compared against the source until it matches.

  4. 04

    Activate AI/BI

    Data agents and conversational analytics on Fabric, Genie, and peers unlock the next layer of insight.

Modules

  • Legacy Estate Intake

    Inventory dashboards, data sources, and real usage across the legacy suite.

  • Auto-Migration Engine

    80–90% of dashboards converted automatically.

  • Parity Validation

    Verify migrated output matches the source.

  • AI/BI Activation

    Stand up data agents on Fabric, Databricks Genie, and peer platforms.

Evidence

What Wayam can show for this entry

T4Reference pattern

Curated solution design with an owner and a review date. No performance or production claim.

Allowed claims at this tier: Possible workflow, typical stack, prerequisites.

Evidence tier
T4 · Reference pattern
Integration status
Typical enterprise system
Metric status
Scenario only
Evidence owner
Not yet attached
Validated
Not yet attached
Valid until
Content version
2026.09

Pending evidence attachment

This entry represents an enterprise architectural reference pattern. Customer benchmarks, run replays, and metric verifications are established during technical discovery.

Limitations

  • Headline metrics are representative until a customer result is attached.

Representative metrics · Reference · scenario only

  • 1,200+

    dashboards migrated

  • 6 weeks

    to completion

  • $4.2M

    license savings

These describe the intended outcome of the design. They are not measured customer results until a validated case is attached above.

Architecture & controls

Composed across the operating loop

Control gates

  • A named approver on every consequential write-back
  • Evidence and audit trail kept with every run
  • Parity validation against the current process

Capability atoms

  • system-connectors
  • document-intelligence
  • parity-validation
  • workflow-orchestration
  • nl-to-query

Typical enterprise systems

Typical stack for solution design; compatibility is validated during discovery.

  • SAP S/4HANA
  • Workday
  • Oracle NetSuite
  • Snowflake
  • SAP MCP
  • Dun and Bradstreet API
  • dbt
  • Monte Carlo

Designed for

technology, financial-services, retail-cpg

Business case

Model a Setu scenario with your own baseline

Three scenarios from the numbers you enter. Capacity released is time; it becomes a saving only when roles or costs are actually removed or avoided.

ScenarioImprovementCapacity releasedCashable savingsNet annualPayback
Conservative9%
Expected18%
Upside24%

Enter an annual volume and a baseline cost to see figures.

Illustrative planning scenario, not a guarantee. Results depend on process baseline, adoption, data quality, integration scope, controls, and deployment costs.

Pilot this

From solution design to a bounded pilot

  1. Step 1 · 3–4 weeks

    Discovery Sprint

    Validate the workflow, data, controls, baseline and business case before anything is built.

    Gate: Blueprint and pilot plan signed by the business owner, technical owner and Wayam.

  2. Step 2 · 6–10 weeks

    Bounded Pilot

    Prove quality and value on agreed data against agreed acceptance tests.

    Gate: Acceptance thresholds met on the evaluation set; go/no-go decision recorded.

Agrani · evidence pending1 Agrani candidate in this solution: Incident Triage Agent

Pairs well with