Skip to content
Plant instrument wall with one raised attention tile
Wayam Solution · Industrial Operations Console · formerly Bridge to LiveT4Reference pattern

Drishti

drishti - sight, the faculty of seeing clearly

One role-aware console for equipment health, energy, alarms, and OT security.

Drishti is a real-time operations console for industrial plants, built around an LNG-site data model and generalized from it. It unifies equipment health, predictive maintenance, energy intelligence, alarm management, OT security, and digital-twin data quality in one place, then tailors the view by role so a reliability engineer and a plant director are looking at the same truth through different lenses. It answers what the sensors say; Arjuna answers what the cameras see.

Workflow

Problem

Plant data is scattered across historians, alarm systems, energy meters, and security tooling, so no one role sees the whole picture and alarm floods bury the signals that matter.

Outcome

Equipment health, predictive maintenance, energy intelligence, alarms, OT security, and digital-twin quality unified into one at-a-glance operating view.

  1. 01

    Unify the plant record

    Historian, SCADA, alarm, energy, and OT security feeds are brought into one model.

  2. 02

    Suppress the noise

    Alarm triage collapses floods and known false positives so operators see events, not volume.

  3. 03

    Detect early

    Thermal, vibration, and throughput anomalies are surfaced before they become downtime.

  4. 04

    Route by role

    Each role gets the slice it can act on, with escalation paths that match the operating structure.

Modules

  • Equipment Health

    Live condition across rotating and static assets, with thermal and vibration risk surfaced early.

  • Alarm Intelligence

    Alarm floods triaged and false positives suppressed so the real events stay visible.

  • Energy Intelligence

    Consumption and efficiency tracked against production so energy cost is attributable.

  • Role-Aware Views

    Plant directors, reliability engineers, maintenance managers, energy managers, and security analysts each see their own console.

Evidence

What Wayam can show for this entry

T4Reference pattern

Curated solution design with an owner and a review date. No performance or production claim.

Allowed claims at this tier: Possible workflow, typical stack, prerequisites.

Evidence tier
T4 · Reference pattern
Integration status
Typical enterprise system
Metric status
Scenario only
Evidence owner
Not yet attached
Validated
Not yet attached
Valid until
Content version
2026.09

Pending evidence attachment

This entry represents an enterprise architectural reference pattern. Customer benchmarks, run replays, and metric verifications are established during technical discovery.

Limitations

  • Headline metrics are representative until a customer result is attached.

Representative metrics · Reference · scenario only

  • One console

    health, energy, alarms, and OT security

  • Role-aware

    views for five operating roles

These describe the intended outcome of the design. They are not measured customer results until a validated case is attached above.

Architecture & controls

Composed across the operating loop

Control gates

  • A named approver on every consequential write-back
  • Evidence and audit trail kept with every run
  • In-boundary deployment available

Capability atoms

  • signal-ingestion
  • system-connectors
  • anomaly-detection
  • root-cause-reasoning
  • alert-routing
  • in-boundary-deployment

Typical enterprise systems

Typical stack for solution design; compatibility is validated during discovery.

  • SAP Ariba
  • Coupa
  • Snowflake
  • Dun and Bradstreet API
  • Cognex VisionPro
  • Siemens MES MCP
  • NVIDIA Jetson
  • SAP S/4HANA

Designed for

energy-utilities, manufacturing, logistics

Business case

Model a Drishti scenario with your own baseline

Three scenarios from the numbers you enter. Capacity released is time; it becomes a saving only when roles or costs are actually removed or avoided.

Improvement is seeded at the midpoint of this entry's directional band (2040%). Source status: scenario only. Edit it to your own estimate.

ScenarioImprovementCapacity releasedCashable savingsNet annualPayback
Conservative11%
Expected21%
Upside29%

Enter an annual volume and a baseline cost to see figures.

Illustrative planning scenario, not a guarantee. Results depend on process baseline, adoption, data quality, integration scope, controls, and deployment costs.

Pilot this

From solution design to a bounded pilot

  1. Step 1 · 3–4 weeks

    Discovery Sprint

    Validate the workflow, data, controls, baseline and business case before anything is built.

    Gate: Blueprint and pilot plan signed by the business owner, technical owner and Wayam.

  2. Step 2 · 6–10 weeks

    Bounded Pilot

    Prove quality and value on agreed data against agreed acceptance tests.

    Gate: Acceptance thresholds met on the evaluation set; go/no-go decision recorded.

Agrani · evidence pending6 Agrani candidates in this solution: Computer Vision Quality Inspection Agent, Incident Triage Agent, Change Risk Assessment Agent, Process Anomaly Detection Agent, Maintenance Work Order Optimization Agent, Predictive Maintenance Agent

Pairs well with